…the NTSB said the FAA should require manufacturers of twin-engine, turbine-powered aircraft to develop a checklist and procedure for a dual engine failure at low altitude, and require operators under Part 121, 135 and 91K to implement the checklist and procedures. Source – NTSB Wants Power-loss Training for Part 135, 91K
And they very well should! I can recall no Part 121 training regarding this very issue. In fact, the lack of such training is almost a disservice to flight crew and passengers. But first let me clarify something.
As an airline pilot I have received PLENTY of training and simulated flights for a single engine failure, that is losing thrust in 1 of our 2 engines. We practice takeoffs, maneuvering flight, instrument approaches, and landings in the 1 engine configuration. So all is well and good there.
Although, I recall no such training on a dual engine failure at any altitude. To be even more specific, the dual engine failure training was merely a review of our quick reference handbook and a discussion on how to perform such an emergency procedure from the comfort of the classroom chair. Granted the very likely hood of having a dual engine failure in a turbine aircraft is so astronomically small that it may not warrant such real world training, but that’s what flight simulators are for right?
Now an airline like mine (which doesn’t do any extended over water flights) may not truly benefit from powerloss and ditching training due to our operational characteristics, but there are still some big lakes that we fly over in North America. I mean, it certainly can’t hurt to receive that knowledge and training in the safety of a flight simulator.
I’ve love to hear your feelings on this so please leave your comments below!
Here’s the original article that spurred this blog post: NTSB Wants Power-loss Training for Part 135, 91K